Answer:
Pvalue of the test is 0.0618 > 0.01, which means that this sample does not provide sufficient evidence at the .01 significance level that the check verification system is effective.
Step-by-step explanation:
A check cashing service found that approximately 5% of all checks submitted to the service were fraudulent.
This means that the null hypothesis is:
Test if the check verification system is effective:
If it is effective, the proportion will decrease, so we are going to test if after the change the proportion is lower than 0.05, that is:
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
0.05 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that
After instituting a check-verification system to reduce its losses, the service found that only 45 checks out of a random sample of 1124 were fraudulent.
This means that
Value of the test statistic:
Pvalue of the test and decision:
Probability of finding a sample proportion lower than 0.04, which is the pvalue of z = -1.54.
Looking at the z-table, z = -1.54 has a pvalue of 0.0618.
Pvalue of the test is 0.0618 > 0.01, which means that this sample does not provide sufficient evidence at the .01 significance level that the check verification system is effective.
