Answer:
see below the con and pros
Explanation:
pros
in the modern-day city of Istanbul which was Constantinople, now its Istanbul, not Constantinople. Which provided the inspiration for a song made famous by They Might Be Giants.
cons
the fall of Byzantine empire, the question of what life would be like, if it hadn’t, will never be answered. Sure, there might be some alternate reality where the Byzantines are alive and well. Aspects of string theory certainly suggest so. But who knows what the modern political landscape might look like with the formal existence of the Byzantine?
pros
The fall of the Byzantine empire is part of the history of the world, as we know it. We might wear hats on our feet for all we know. What might the world look like if the empire had not fallen?
cons
Fall of the Byzantine empire led to an abundance of knowledge that is lost forever, think about that forever. The loss of “Greek Fire” is definitely a drag. Greek Fire was an incendiary weapon used by the Byzantine navy, and could burn on water. No one knows just what went into that technological advantage possessed by the Byzantines.
Answer:
American imperialism helped to bring new cultures toward modern educational standards. Cultures were able to learn global languages, allowing for easier communication between cultures. Being able to read and write allowed individuals to begin creating new goals for their families.
brandongaille for more
Explanation:
The factor that did not contribute to industrial revolution are the people who wanted to maintain feudalism to stay in power. I think the landlords who are used to this system and did not try to adapt wouldn't want that significant change.
Answer:
European explorers used non-European inventions such as the astrolabe, the compass, and gunpowder.
Explanation:
The other three answers are simply false. There was no interest from Asian cultures to invite trade or religious exchange. Africans and Native American were seldom used as crew on the ships.
It was the technological influence what made a difference. This is an interesting topic because it was Europeans who took advantage of those inventions.
There are theories that try to explain why didn't the Asian, and particularly the Chinese, used those inventions to explore the Pacific.
One such theory says that Europeans had a bigger need for expansion outwards, while the Chinese could focus on an internal expansion.
They exported teas<span>, </span>salt<span>, </span>sugar<span>, </span>porcelain<span>, and </span><span>spices
They imported </span>cotton<span>, </span>ivory<span>, </span>wool<span>, </span>gold<span>, and </span><span>silver</span>
