The statement, according to the erosion model of an organizational commitment, the employee with the fewest emotional bonds is the most likely to quit, is true.
The erosion model explains that an organization's employee who have less or fewer emotional bonds tend to quit the organization because they do not feel or get involved in the organization, or they don't feel any attachment to it.
Here the social influence model states that suppose when two employees are closely related or have good terms, so if one of them quits their work, then the other one is more likely to follow them and leave the organization.
Hence, the erosion model suggests that employees with fewer bonds will be most likely to quit the organization.
To learn more about erosion model here:
brainly.com/question/28444776
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": hygiene factors.
Explanation:
According to American psychologist Frederick Herzberg (1923-2000) in his Motivation-Hygiene Theory -<em>also known as Two Factor Theory</em>- some factors lead to individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction at work. Achievement, recognition, and growth are examples of factors that lead to satisfaction and policies, supervision, salaries or security influence dissatisfaction.
Though, <em>solving problems related to dissatisfaction will not make employees satisfied. Herzberg concluded that the opposite of satisfaction is no satisfaction and the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction.</em>
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
Im not completely sure bc i dont see anything other than letters so im gonna say B
