Answer:
$16,773.36
Explanation:
this is an annuity due since Jake will need to withdraw money at the beginning of the year, not the end of the year:
principal = $60,000
n = 4 distributions
interest rate = 8%
annual withdrawal = principal / annuity due factor (PV, 8%, 4 periods)
annual withdrawal = $60,000 / 3.5771 = $16,773.36
Answer:
The company should process further:
Product B.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Product A sales value at split-off point = $1,200
Cost of further processing of Product A = $600
Sales proceeds from Product A after further processing = $1,700
Product B sales value at split-off point = $3,000
Cost of further processing of Product B = $800
Sales proceeds from Product B after further processing = $4,000
b) There is no additional revenue gained from further processing of Product A. Instead, there is a loss of $100 ($1,800 - $1,700). This is unlike Product B where there is a gain of $200 ($4,000 - $3,800) from further processing. The company's decision should be to sell Product A at split-off while further processing Product B to realize incremental revenue.
<span>Should have bought more units of x and less units of y as dollar utility per item x is 24 Ă— 8 / 10 = 19.2 while dollar utility per y is 20 Ă— 5 / 14 = 7.14, but they have to be equal, i.e., 192 Ă— y = 100 Ă— x</span>
X=$88.20 is the answer to your question
Answer:
SWOT threat analysis
Explanation:
SWOT analysis stands for: Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats
The business that wants to stay afloat must constantly engage in self examination in line with national and international demonstration effect on the firm. in line with this, it must be able to identify the firm's:
Strengths in the market place and among competitors with view to maximizing it,
Weaknesses to know its limitations and possibility of converting weakness to strength,
Opportunities - To have information of existing opportunities and choose the ones that can produce adequate returns on investment
Threats - To know the activities of both competitors and legal framework that may constitute a threat to its existence or affect its existing returns on investment.
Therefore Remington Arms is trying to identify the threats to its business
