The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The business decision based on the company where you work would be this. To open a new small branch of the fast-food restaurant as a concession in the municipal stadium.
The incremental cost is the future costs as a result of this business decision. This means that we have to consider extra money on a monthly basis to pay for the rent of the concession booth at the Municipal stadium.
The opportunity cost is that instead of opening our branch in the new downtown mall, we decided to move with the stadium option. Having decided to be at the mall could have allowed us to have more clients on a daily basis, especially on weekends.
The sunk cost is a cost from the past, an historical cost that really is not important in the present time to make a decision. Maybe, just a reference to a case in the past. And that's it.
Here we can refer to a cost when we opened the first location of the restaurant, but it was five years ago. Those were different situations, necessities, and conditions.
Answer:
Collision
uninsured motorist
comprehensive
liability coverage
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Abraham who has just purchased his first car. His bank, First State Bank, loaned him the money to buy the car and has required him to purchase insurance to protect the car as the collateral for the loan. In this case the basic types of coverage Abraham should buy to satisfy the bank requirement and to best protect himself from the risks of operating an automobile are;
✓ uninsured motorist
✓comprehensive
✓liability coverage
Insurance is very essential in protecting an individual or firm from any form of financial loss, it can be regarded as a kind of risk management and it is way to avoid uncertain loss. Then if Adam could buy the coverage he will be protected from loss in future.
C. Title Fee
The company will perform a title search to ensure that there is a clear path of ownership so there can be a legal sale contract.
Answer:
B) The contract rules of the UCC apply, because the predominant purpose of the contract was sale of goods.
Explanation:
The contract doesn´t include in its mayor part provision of services. And Sally wanted to sue Good Carpet for the services that they provided, not for the good it sells.
