The phrase from the excerpt that suggests that Krogstad is prone to engage in crime and may, in fact, be a criminal is the following one:
diseased moral character
It is the only option that talks about somebody being a bad person, which is what Krogstad is. The other options do not show that moral ambiguity this option does.
C. In Beowulf his thoughts are clearly explained but in Grendel his thoughts are vague.
I would say A bill of rights because you can get a lot of information from a lot of sites the other options are pretty specific questions that you'd get one answer from if you researched them. hope this makes sense
The audience sees her as someone worth listening to—a clear or insightful thinker, or at ... Some of the questions you can ask yourself as you evaluate an author's ethos ... Does she avoid selective use of evidence or other types of manipulation of data? Does she speak respectfully about people who may have opinions and ...
