Answer:
Westermarck was telling us that there are no absolute standards in morality and that moral truth is relative. The reason for his approach is that each person has a moral conscience that is unique. One cannot apply a standard theory of philosophical thought to each person, because each person’s morality is predicated upon the way he or she was brought up. Virtue Ethics deals with a person’s character, and the formation of that character has its beginnings at an early age by what that person was taught. Westermarck and Aristotle have similar thought processes involving an individual. Aristotle believed that moral virtue is product of habit learned from an early age. Westermarck thought that moral views were based upon subjective factors. Subjective habits are learned from parents, teachers, and life experiences unique to an individual. A consciousness of morality is derived from those teachings and experiences learned in youth. These moral thoughts were a product of reflection of what had been taught overtime, and which would become rational expressions of individual morality as an adult. Is it not true that the virtue of person is based upon what his or her moral conscience consists of? The psychological effects of these teachings and experiences gleamed in youth cannot be discarded as mere sophomoric intrusions of moral liabilities against the standards of morality, but must be considered an integral component for the search of moral truth. Westermarck’s theory is just as valid as any other moral theory.
Explanation:
Kevin Gover apologizes for the misdemeanor of the BIA towards American Indians and Alaska Natives.
Explanation:
The speech was delivered by Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs Kevin Grover at the celebration of the 175th anniversary of BIA (Bureau of Indian Affairs) with an intent to emphasis on the ethnic and cultural indifference or misbehavior towards American Indians and Alaska Natives.
Gover points out how children and their parents who were sent to BIA Boarding School suffered shame and lived in fear when subject to alcohol, drug abuse and domestic violence.
His apology was to emphasize on ethnic cleansing and destroying cultural difference as to what happened in the past cannot be changed, but we can look on to have a good future. His confession of all the wrongdoings by BIA was to lay stress on the healing that all should undergo which can enable to forget the past and focus on the future.
Answer:
since i dont have alot of context, i think it is Rakesh could have just ignored the loud thumps coming from the other side of the room and instead gone back to sleep.
The process by which plants use sunlight , water and carbon dioxide to create oxygen and energy