"x" represents an unknown number, we know that 70% of x equals 63.
To calculate the percentage of a number you have to multiply the said number by the percentage, in this case, 70%, and divide the result by 100:
So the 70% of x can be calculated as:
You can simplify this expression by solving the division
Then the expression that shows you the relationship is
Using this expression you can determine the value of x, to do so you have to divide both sides of the equal sign by 0.7
The value of x is 90
Answer:
15050
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
So basically, this arithmetic sequence follows the rule (3n-1). What you are looking for is the summation of (3n-1) with a lower limit of 1 and an upper limit of 100. This, plugging it into a calculator (etc. symbolab) or even calculating it manually, we get ∑↑100↓n=1⇒3n-1=15050.
Answer:
2.5 times deeper duh
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
P (factors of 12) = 5/6
Step-by-step explanation:
The possibilities are 1,2,3,4,5,6
Factors of 12 are 1,2,3,4,6,12
So out of the possibilities rolled
1,2,3,4,6 are factors of 12 (5 of the 6)
P (factors of 12) = 5/6
Answer:
production cost f(x), in dollars, for x number of units produced by company 1:
f(x) = 0.05x^2 − 7x + 300
2) Table that represents the production cost g(x), in dollars, for x number of units produced by company 2:
x g(x)
0.6 899.58
0.8 899.52
1 899.50
1.2 899.52
1.4 899.58
3) Comparison: do a table for f(x) with the same x-values of the table for g(x).
x f(x) = 0.05x^2 − 7x + 300 g(x)
0.6 295.818 899.58
0.8 294.432 899.52
1 293.05 899.50
1.2 291.672 899.52
1.4 290.298 899.58
As you can see the values of f(x) are consistently lower than the values of g(x) for the same x-values.
The minimum production cost for company 2 is around 899.50 at x = 1, while the minimum production cost of company 1 is defintely lower (lower than 292.298 for sure, in fact if you find the vertex it is 55).
Answer: Based on the given information, the minimum production cost for company 2 is greater.
Step-by-step explanation:
