Answer:
His sword did not cut deep enough to kill the dragon and he was old. He was left alone by his men to defend himself.
Explanation:
<span>(.It Is .B. Howls.).</span>
Answer:
D) wants to admit his confusion about the sometimes-stifling life choices that creative people make
Explanation:
(sorry I dont have a Explanation this time)
Answer: D. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” certainly differ in writing techniques and language use. In Jackson's speech, there are long sentences, which makes the speech convincing and helps him demonstrate his intelligence. However, Rutledge's sentences are often short, quite simple and straightforward.
Yes they have but in different terms. It depends how you are speaking about it. If you are saying in terms of how humans perceive achievement, or how humans process it then I could be of help. It terms of human perception, it is viewed as a thing to admire and envy. If were to put on a resume that you accomplished things differed for the better from the other resumes, that would be an achievement . That would be something the other applicants would admire and envy in the face of their failure to accomplish the things you did. In terms of human perception, it is a positive thing for yourself, but for others it could be there downfall. Refer to the example above.
