Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
Answer:
Case background
1. Identify the plaintiff and defendant in the case.
2. Explain why the case was brought to the Supreme Court.
3. Describe the goal of each side in the case. What type of decision was desired?
Constitutional connections
4. Explain the key rights or amendments involved in the case.
5. Did the case primarily center on an issue of civil rights or civil liberties? Explain.
Case outcomes
6. Describe the majority decision of the court and several arguments as to why the justices ruled the way they did.
7. If there was one dissenting decision of the court, explain it in detail. Why did some justices disagree with the majority?
8. What precedent was set by the court’s decision? What impact did it have on American society?
Explanation:
Answer:
Many people were fearful of having a ruler in power, they just fought a war to break free from a king.
The Due Process<span> Clause of the </span>Fourteenth Amendment<span> is exactly like a similar provision in the Fifth </span>Amendment<span>, which only restricts the federal government. It states that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without </span>due process<span> of law.”</span>
Paige might have Social Anxiety, be a Introvert, be Anti-Social, or just dose not like to be around people.
