The slope is 2 and the y intercept is 4
Answer:
60
Step-by-step explanation:
5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
One is given the following function:
One is asked to evaluate the function for 
, substitute 
in place of 
, and simplify to evaluate:
A recursive formula is another method used to represent the formula of a sequence such that each term is expressed as a function of the last term in the sequence. In this case, one is asked to find the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence: that is, a sequence of numbers where the difference between any two consecutive terms is constant. The following general formula is used to represent the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence:
Where (
) is the evaluator term (
) represents the term before the evaluator term, and (d) represents the common difference (the result attained from subtracting two consecutive terms). In this case (and in the case for most arithmetic sequences), the common difference can be found in the standard formula of the function. It is the coefficient of the variable (n) or the input variable. Substitute this into the recursive formula, then rewrite the recursive formula such that it suits the needs of the given problem,
Answer:
A) is a function
B) f(x) is greater
C) x = 12
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Yes, the relation is a function.
A function has a unique input value for each output value. There are no repeated x-values, so this relation is a function.
__
B) The table says y=6 for x=6.
f(6) = 2(6)+16 = 28
f(x) has a greater value for x=6.
__
C) Substituting the given information, we have ...
40 = 2x +16
24 = 2x
12 = x
The value of x is 12 when f(x) is 40.
My initial answer was $2750.45, and I will show you my calculations.
Calc : 6774.5 ÷ 100 = 67.745
67.745 × 2.7 = 182.9115
182.9115 × 22 = 4024.053
6774.5 - 4024.053 = 2750.45
= $2750.45
At first I thought this was correct, but after studying my answer I realise that the amount of interest would rise as the amount of money went up, therefore my calculations are very wrong. If I work out the answer, I will get back to you, but the calculation is more complicated than I first predicted
