1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenKa [72]
2 years ago
7

If you can write a paragraph out about the following points you'll get +50 points and awarded brainliest.

Social Studies
1 answer:
bulgar [2K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

4)is the answer

Explanation:

Different questions they ask and how they support them

You might be interested in
In 500 words or more (no less), explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics. You may use examples, but you w
Vilka [71]

Answer and explanation:

Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.

  • <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>

In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.

  • <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>

<em />

The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.

6 0
2 years ago
Please help, 50 points and I will mark brainliest!
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:Economists have had an enormous impact on trade policy, and they provide a strong rationale for free trade and for removal of trade barriers.  Although the objective of a trade agreement is to liberalize trade, the actual provisions are heavily shaped by domestic and international political realities.  The world has changed enormously from the time when David Ricardo proposed the law of comparative advantage, and in recent decades economists have modified their theories to account for trade in factors of production, such as capital and labor, the growth of supply chains that today dominate much of world trade, and the success of mercantilist countries in achieving rapid growth.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why is this system known as “checks” and “balances”?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. ... Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them.

Explanation:

Yes!

6 0
2 years ago
Martin Luther King said the following during the Civil Rights movement: I think America must see that riots do not develop out o
makkiz [27]

Sure, America is a superpower. However, that does not mean that is it perfect. On the outside, to the rest of the world, America is heaven. Perfect everywhere. However, on the inside, it is not perfect. In fact, it is far from perfect.

Each country has its own problems. Sure, some of them can't be solved, like a geographical issue, or a monetary issue, but not this one. Sure, other countries have issues,  but not as severe as this one. The impact is greater than most people will ever experience during their life times, even after dying. But this is worse than ever before.

As a country, we can't fix this. As a group of people, we still can't. We must not separate, or discriminate, but rather unite, collaborate, and become one. Bridges are not built on one big piece, but rather multiple that come together to hold the bridge. Like a bridge's support, you can help fix this issue. It's just a matter of whether not you are able to.

7 0
3 years ago
Can you name the three Laws of Motion?
leonid [27]

Answer:

:)

Explanation:

The laws are: (1) Every object moves in a straight line unless acted upon by a force. (2) The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force exerted and inversely proportional to the object's mass. (3) For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the purpose of this kind of map?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes relative location?
    13·1 answer
  • Original Source Material
    12·1 answer
  • Aristotle identified ___________ as using the rational appeals of logic and evidence to be persuasive.
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes a countercultural group?
    12·2 answers
  • Geopolitics looks at the way in which international affairs can be understood through geographical factors: not just physical la
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case?
    13·2 answers
  • Correct=brainliest question is in the screenshot
    6·2 answers
  • How many countries in the Sub saharan region are considered to have average development
    7·1 answer
  • rosa, an avoid tennis player, is beginning to feel some slight aches in her elbows and knees, something she has never experience
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!