Hamlet, Act I, Scene I contains suspense because it has plot twists and unresolved questions.
We know that the king is dead, but we don't know who killed him or what Hamlet is going to do about it, given that he knows his father didn't die of natural causes.
The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
Answer:
On the other side of the island, "swathed at midday with mirage, defended by the shield of the quiet lagoon, one might dream of rescue," but, on this side, "the brute obtuseness of the ocean" makes rescue seem impossible.
Explanation:
His erratic behavior confuses his friend
Answer:
peer comparisons are nothing but our imagination and negitive thinking , by this the person may get depressed and do something undesirable.
Explanation:
I don't have anyersonal experience but I this there would be other resons for Wes dawn into drug dealing. No one take that big risk just for a headset. I hope u got the answer....
