1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GrogVix [38]
3 years ago
10

Describe one factor that increases the likelihood for the supreme court to accept an appeal.

Law
1 answer:
drek231 [11]3 years ago
4 0
One factor that is likelihood of the Supreme Court accepting an appeal is when it involves an unusual important legal principle
You might be interested in
Alfred is a defense attorney. He is trying to prepare a strong case for his client, Jeffrey, who has been accused of several cri
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer: Motion for severance of charges

3 0
1 year ago
Describe the rules for collecting evidence against a defendant.
Xelga [282]

Answer: Hope that helps!

Explanation: The guidelines for evidence collection refer to the legal rules of a jurisdiction that dictate how law enforcement officials may collect evidence to prove the commission of a crime or the commission of a tort. Evidence can constitute anything used to demonstrate an accused individual's guilt in criminal activity or in a civil case

7 0
3 years ago
Who was not allowed to vote for the new bill of rights
Valentin [98]
The Bill of Rights 1689, also known as the Bill of Rights 1688,[nb 2] is a landmark Act in the constitutional law of England that sets out certain basic civil rights and clarifies who would be next to inherit the Crown. It received the Royal Assent on 16 December 1689 and is a restatement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William III and Mary II in February 1689, inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England. The Bill of Rights lays down limits on the powers of the monarch and sets out the rights of Parliament, including the requirement for regular parliaments, free elections, and freedom of speech in Parliament.[3] It sets out certain rights of individuals including the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and confirmed that "Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law". It also includes no right of taxation without Parliament's agreement. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights described and condemned several misdeeds of James II of England.[
5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of an ethical norm?
Molodets [167]

freedom should be the answer

hope this helps

God bless!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The "iron law of oligarchy" is a principle
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.

Explanation:

The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.

The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What refers to any instrument or weapon used in a death, such as a knife or firearm?
    13·1 answer
  • A suspected terrorist is arrested in connection with an imminent terror threat.  A bomb has been discovered at a local shopping
    12·2 answers
  • What does it mean when our court system is identified as a dual court system?
    14·2 answers
  • Rita keeps book records, and runs reading and learning enhancement programs. What Is her profession?
    14·1 answer
  • ______________ is a legally-required element of a valid and enforceable real estate contract.
    11·1 answer
  • Kaakibat na tungkulin pumili ng lider na ihahalal <br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Please answer question in a few sentences... I will mark you brainliest
    6·2 answers
  • Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
    10·1 answer
  • Public figures: Group of answer choices can never have an action in defamation. lose their defamation action rights if the remar
    5·1 answer
  • What US Supreme Court case decided that the death penalty itself did NOT violate the Constitution?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!