1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spin [16.1K]
3 years ago
10

If you saw two college students throwing rocks through the windows of

Law
2 answers:
daser333 [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I prolly wouldn't report them. It's none of my business, why should I care?

Thanks for the points btw

stira [4]3 years ago
3 0
Yes and yes. Both things happening aren’t good things and if a random person was doing it I would report it and if my friends were doing it i would still report it. The right thing to to report both no matter how mad the people might be. INTEGRITY- doing the right thing when no one is watching.
You might be interested in
You are the Police Officer...
REY [17]

they would be charged with possession of an illegal substance (depending what state and how many kilos the baggy is carrying) and yes you do have a reason for arrest and john would be arrested

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
______ normally are white rectangles with black letters or symbols.
kozerog [31]

Answer:

REGULATION SIGNS normally are white rectangles with black letters or symbols

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
True or False: Crime is an example of deviation from formal norms<br><br> (Please help, thank you!)
azamat

Answer: True

Explanation:

You just need to use critical thinking on this, follow me and give me points pls

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recogn
pshichka [43]

Answer:

The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.  The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between an EMT and a Paramedic?
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

EMTs work on the front lines of emergency medical services, providing support to patients, before they reach a hospital. They are trained in administering basic medical care and CPR. ... Paramedics are advanced emergency medical care providers. They provide advanced life support to patients.

Explanation:

Brainliest is apprecitaed

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the basic types of resources needed to produce goods and services?
    11·1 answer
  • 5.
    10·2 answers
  • When a suspected criminal is arrested, does the victim prosecute the suspected criminal and collect any fine imposed?
    13·2 answers
  • In which case did the party in question have the contractual capacity to make a valid contract?
    6·1 answer
  • Yes or no; Is it possible to have as many representatives as people, if government wants to prevent abuse of power?
    7·1 answer
  • What happens if a minor gets caught smoking with other minors
    15·1 answer
  • Tools
    12·1 answer
  • Briefly define the term "assembly line justice" in your own words.
    14·1 answer
  • In a similar previous case the court ruled for the plaintiff. The court will now consider that previous ruling in deciding how t
    9·1 answer
  • Deneen sweeting was a defendant in the third circuit in 2000. what aspect of criminal law is his case about
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!