Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.
Explanation:
The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.
With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.
In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.
But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.
Here’s what the law now says:
SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.
SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'd say this just for the fact that the parent didn't kill the coach, but still gave the coach some cash to fix up his car and the bills he had to pay for. it also depends on the type of injuries he got, I guess. thats my thoughts, anyways- I'm just a kid so I'm just giving some input.
The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called <u>jurisprudence</u><u>.</u> It is the concept that differentiates public from private law.
What holds true about jurisprudence?
Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law. Several theories that assist explain the beginnings of law and its justification have evolved over the years. These legal theories (or philosophies) are referred to as jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law.
Positive law jurisprudence:
It thinks that law is only the state's orders enforced through force. Proper law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought.
Learn more about jurisprudence here:
brainly.com/question/14612573
#SPJ4
