The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare and Contrast the words of the song to the views of U.S. Government officials of the late 1800s and early 1900s and with the text of the Dawes Act.
Ok, first we have to say the m¿name of the song that is going to be compared. It is "Don't Drink that Water," performed by David Mattews Band.
Part of the lyrics says the following<em>."What were you expecting? Not room for both. Jus room for me....Yes, I will call this home...You have been banished..."</em>
This song can be compared to the Dawes Act in that this act broke up the Native tribes to support the "Americanization" of the Native Indians and the settling of the white Americans in their territories.
It was Massachusetts legislator Henry Dawes who supported the Dawes Act in 1887, a piece of legislation known as the General Allotment Act.
The correct answer is B. attain stability and peace in Europe.
The idea behind it was about centralizing production and manufacturing and the division of resources so that countries wouldn't have to worry about them. This would in the long run bring about stability and peace in Europe because people wouldn't fight for resources.
The answer is "interest groups"
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct option is D.
Marginal cost refers to the amount of money it cost a company to produce one more of a particular product while the marginal benefit refers to the benefit that is obtained as a result of producing that one extra product. Profit is maximized when the marginal cost equals the marginal benefits.
@Verified
There was not a lot of rule or law.
