Answer:
1,3,4
Explanation: Those are the one I would choose.
Answer:
Comment for statement A - The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
Comment for statement B - There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Explanation:
a)
“I like the IRR rule. I can use it to rank projects without having to specify a discount rate”
The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
b.
“I like the payback rule. As long as the minimum payback period is short, the rule makes sure that the company takes no borderline projects. That reduces risk”
There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Based on Davidson Company's cash from bonds, and cash dividends paid, the net cash flow from financing activities is $70,000.
<h3 /><h3>What is the net cash from financing activities for Davidson Company?</h3>
The financing activities have to do with debt, and stock.
The net cash from financing acitivities is therefore:
= Bond issuance - Cash dividends paid
Solving gives:
= 80,000 - 10,000
= $70,000
In conclusion, the net cash from financing is $70,000.
Find out more on financing activities at brainly.com/question/14441404.
Answer:
(a) What was the total of accounts written off during the first 11 months?
bad debts written for the first 11 months = allowance for bad debt accounts January 1 balance + bad debt expense - allowance for bad debt accounts November 30 balance = $13,085 + $21,937 - $9,919 = $25,103
(b) As the result of a comprehensive analysis, it is determined that the December 31, 2010, balance of the Allowance for Bad Debts account should be $9,450. Show the adjustment required in the journal entry format.Allowance for bad debt Debit $Bad debt expenses Credit $
to determine the amount of bad debt expense that must be adjusted, we must subtract the estimated balance in December 31 from the balance in November 30 = $9,919 - $9,450 = $469. Since the November 30 amount is larger, it means that we over estimated our bad debt expense and it must be reduced:
Dr Allowance for doubtful accounts 469
Cr Accounts receivable 469
Answer: Modified product strategy
Explanation:
The modifying product strategy is one of the important strategy in the market as it basically refers to the value adding information and also modification in the existing products.
- The modified product strategy also known as the product life cycle where the existing products are get modified according to the new product strategy.
- By adding various types of features and also improve the performance of the product then it known as the product modification.
Therefore, the modified product strategy are used by the company for producing various types of new products and their aim is to produce the new product in the given original target in the market.
