This isn't a question it's a statement.
????????
Warmth judgments on nearness to a solution <u>rise suddenly just</u> prior to the solution of an insight problem and <u>gradually rise</u> prior to the solution of a non-insight problem.
Option c
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The examinee is required to shift his/her perspective to a novel way to achieve the solution in insight problems. The three types of insight problems are: mathematical, spatial, and verbal. They are totally based on the perspective of the person and how good they can process the information thinking in a different way.
Non insight problems are solved through systematically applying the knowledge through logical deduction of the individual, and does not require novel thinking. Also, the warmth judgement on nearing to a solution rise suddenly just prior to the solution of an insight problem and gradually rise gradually prior to the solution of a non insight problem.
Answer:
i think its this one All Native Americans were being moved west of the Mississippi River.
Explanation:
Based on the given scenario, we can see that Rachael's confession is:
- C. admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to those inalienable privileges which a human being which cannot be taken away unless under special circumstances and some of them include:
- Right to life
- Right to fair hearing
- Freedom of assembly, etc
With this in mind, we can see that Rachael waived her Fofth Amendment rights and confessed to a crime after brief interrogation by the police so this is admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1288668
