When an appositive is not placed next to the noun it renames, the appositive is called a delayed appositive.
Therefore the answer should be false
Good luck!
Answer:
<h3>How did it happen?</h3>
Explanation:
- Cause explains <u>the reason how something has happened or occurred. It helps in finding answers to how an incidence took place</u>. The question one should ask when one sees a cause clue word would be "How did it happen?"
- In this way the cause can be answered with answers explaining how it happened. For instance, when Jim asked Tom "How did it happen?", Tom replied "It happened when I kept the candles close to the screen so that I can do a hand shadow puppet".
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
Answer: I’m doing good and how about you
Explanation:
<span>I am taking this test on Plato right now and I am choosing approaching.</span>