Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
After a the war Panama was in Debt
Thus U.S.A bought it making it as it's own.
Therefore they made the canal as a short route to go between the small area between the nor
th and south.
Answer:
innovative
Explanation:
In the company, an innovative change is applied. The developments that take place within the organization go from the plane of ideas to the plane of reality. It is the introduction of a change with the intention of improving a process or a new organizational method for the internal practices of the company and the organization of the workplace.
Well let's start with theft. Just because the keys are there doesn't mean that's an open invitation to take something.
Then there's the business of driving
- without a licence
- with no insurance
- with no name on the registration.
What do you think? Does that go beyond unruly or mischievous? And these are just general considerations. Wait till insurance gets into it. In come cases they may not pay. So now what?
Four general counts and more to come from the lawyers who deal with this sort of thing all the time. I would say that 14 year old better start worrying a bit.
