Answer:
x>-2
Step-by-step explanation:
The translated inequality to be solved is -3x<6
You divide -3 by both sides which switches the sign because it is negative, there fore the answer is x>-2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Domain of a rational function is everywhere except where we set vertical asymptotes. or removable discontinues
Here, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ead8/5ead8c02ff91481affd4d90e770303b4b9710611" alt="\frac{x(2x - 3)}{(x + 2)x}"
First, notice we have x in both the numerator and denomiator so we have a removable discounties at x.
Since, we don't want x to be 0,
We have a removable discontinuity at x=0
Now, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5efd/a5efdbc3fdc9a531266f659cdfdc1113350d4487" alt="\frac{2x - 3}{x + 2}"
We don't want the denomiator be zero because we can't divide by zero.
so
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b06/c3b06566fa0ccb023316f302795ba5dbc836f8e5" alt="x + 2 = 0"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11ec1/11ec16d196161eba0a460e9040bb7cda528b138a" alt="x = - 2"
So our domain is
All Real Numbers except-2 and 0.
The vertical asymptors is x=-2.
To find the horinzontal asymptote, notice how the numerator and denomator have the same degree. So this mean we will have a horinzontal asymptoe of
The leading coeffixent of the numerator/ the leading coefficent of the denomiator.
So that becomes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dda7/6dda7c0780cb99965886a1d364b461c5460b9f26" alt="\frac{2}{1} = 2"
So we have a horinzontal asymptofe of 2
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Answer:
Y=1800+150x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
2(3x - 5) = 2x + 6 ( divide both sides by 2 )
3x - 5 = x + 3 ( subtract x from both sides )
2x - 5 = 3 ( add 5 to both sides )
2x = 8 ( divide both sides by 2 )
x = 4