Are the equations m+3=-5 and m-4=-12$ equivalent?

Suppose 244 subjects are treated with a drug that is used to treat pain and 51 of them developed nausea. Use a 0.01 significance

vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.209 -0.2}{\sqrt{\frac{0.2(1-0.2)}{244}}}=0.351$

$p_v =P(z>0.351)=0.363$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of subjects with nauseas is not higher than 0.2 or 20% at 1% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=244 represent the random sample taken

X=51 represent the subjects with nausea

$\hat p=\frac{51}{244}=0.209$ estimated proportion of subjects with nausea

$p_o=0.2$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.01$ represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is higher than 0.2.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.2$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.2$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.209 -0.2}{\sqrt{\frac{0.2(1-0.2)}{244}}}=0.351$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.01$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>0.351)=0.363$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of subjects with nauseas is not higher than 0.2 or 20% at 1% of significance.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the simplified form of <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%5Csqrt%7B135%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="3\sqrt{135}" alt="3\

Y_Kistochka [10]

The answer is: $9\sqrt{15}$