Answer:
void
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of contracts, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this agreement between Skye and Nathan is an example of a void contract. A void contract is a formal agreement that is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable from the moment it is created. Which in this situation it is void because Nathan is clinically insane, thus not able to actually agree to anything.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: i'm pretty sure its Making informed decisions when voting
Explanation: that's all :)
the driver on the left must yield the right-of-way to the driver on the right.
If you reach an intersection that is not controlled at the same time as a driver on your right, and both of you prepare to go straight the driver on the left must yield the right-of-way to the driver on the right.
The etymology of the term driver, inherited from the 15th century, refers to the profession of driving working animals, especially wagons and wagons. The verb 'to drive' originally means 'to move by force, to move by force.
Traffic accidents would be greatly reduced if drivers were well trained. Knowing driving skills is important for keeping the roads safe for everyone. At the same time, it also serves as a major breakthrough in many incarnations. Learning to drive well is a difficult task, but a very important one.
Disclaimer: Learn more about driving here brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ4
Answer:
Its architecture
Explanation:The architecture used there was inspired of Greek,Roman architecture and the renaissance
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
