I believe what you're looking for is economics, but I could be wrong.
You mean phases?just to name a few crescent full moon
According to the doctrine of separation of powers, the U.S. Constitution distributed the power of the federal government among these three branches, and built a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch could become too powerful.
According to the author of the text, Karl Marx is the most prominent representative of indeterminism.
Some cases of non-deterministic explanations are consistent with deterministic metaphysics and simply indicate epistemological uncertainty about certain outcomes. For example, if you buy scratch cards, chances are you won't get anything.
Karl Marx He is a 19th century German philosopher. He worked mainly in the field of political philosophy and was a well-known advocate of communism. He was co-author of the Communist Manifesto and author of Capitalism, together forming the foundation of Marxism.
Marx denounced capitalism as a system that alienates the masses. His reasoning is as follows: Workers produce goods for the market, but market forces, not workers, control goods. People must work for the capitalists who have full control over the means of production and who hold power in the workplace.
Learn more about indeterminism at
brainly.com/question/6501276
#SPJ4
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
