1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
3 years ago
10

(-5i)(-3i) ASAP!!! Brainlest Solving quadratic equations Simply

Mathematics
1 answer:
yKpoI14uk [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

15i^2

Step-by-step explanation:

a negative times a positive is a negative and a negative times a negative is positive

-5×-3=15 and i×i=i^2

You might be interested in
Show twelve in four different ways use words pictures and numbers
Hunter-Best [27]
24/4: 24-12: 12+0: 12/1: 48/4: 72/6:

3 0
3 years ago
) a pair of fair dice is rolled. what is the probability that the sum of the top faces is a number 10 or greater?
andrezito [222]
Possible number combinations are 1,1  2,1  3,1  4,1  5,1  6,1  1,2  2,2  3,2  4,2  5,2  6,2  1,3  2,3  3,3  4,3  5,3  6,3  1,4  2,4  3,4  4,4  5,4  6,4  1,5  2,5  3,5  4,5  5,5  6,5  1,6  2,6  3,6  4,6  5,6 and 6,6. of those 36 number combinations the ones that add up to more than 10 include: 4,6  5,5  5,6  6,4  6,5  6,6. thats 6 number combinations. 6/36 of the possible sums of the top faces equal out to 10 or more. 6/36=1/6=0.166666666666666666666666(repeating) and to put that in a percentage, 16.7%
the probability is 16.7%
Hope this helps.
5 0
3 years ago
If I can walk 9673.6 meters in 5 hours. How far can I walk in 70 minutes. ( I need the work)
den301095 [7]

First, convert 5 hours into minutes:

5 hours 60 min

------------ * --------------- = 300 min

1 1 hr

Next, find the unit rate in m/min:

9673.6 m

--------------- = 32.24 m/min

300 min

Now find the distance you can walk in 70 minutes at this rate:

32.24 m

------------- * 70 min = 2247 meters (answer)

1 min

You could walk 2247 meters (to the nearest meter) in 70 minutes.

6 0
4 years ago
In the book Essentials of Marketing Research, William R. Dillon, Thomas J. Madden, and Neil H. Firtle discuss a research proposa
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

X_{1}=25 represent the number of homeowners who would buy the security system

X_{2}=9 represent the number of renters who would buy the security system

n_{1}=140 sample 1

n_{2}=60 sample 2

p_{1}=\frac{25}{140}=0.179 represent the proportion of homeowners who would buy the security system

p_{2}=\frac{9}{60}= 0.15 represent the proportion of renters who would buy the security system

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the two proportions differs , the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{25+9}{140+60}=0.17  

Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided \alpha, but we can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

6 0
3 years ago
1) 5.4 +(-9.7)<br> Find the sum
harina [27]

Answer:

-4.3

Step-by-step explanation:

5.4 +(-9.7)

= 5.4-9.7

=-4.3

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What expessions are equivalent to 2(25)
    14·1 answer
  • Given the similar triangles, find the value of X.
    9·1 answer
  • Nathan took his car in for service and repairs. He had a coupon for 10% off
    9·1 answer
  • In Art class, there was a bucket of markers on the counter with nine blue, six green, and ten orange markers. Each student will
    7·1 answer
  • Hi! Can someone answer these for me, please?
    11·1 answer
  • It’s for pre-algebra 6x=24
    14·2 answers
  • Work out the percentage change when a price of £20 is increased to £50
    5·1 answer
  • Move two choices to the blanks to correctly complete the sentences.
    14·1 answer
  • Are the equations m + 3 = -5 and m = -2 equivalent? Explain why or why not?
    13·1 answer
  • In the diagram, the radius of the outer circle is 5 centimeters and the area of the shaded region is 16π square centimeters. Fin
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!