Answer:
a) After adding the 0 test score, the mean would be the most appropriate measure of center to describe the data-------> is true
b) After adding the 0 test score, the mean would be affected-----> is true
c) After adding the 0 test score, the median would be the most appropriate measure of center to describe the data-----> is false
d) Before the missed test, Eva’s median score was 96-----> is false
e) Before the missed test, Eva’s median score was 91------ is true
f) Before the missed test, Eva’s mean score was 91.8-----> is true
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps:)
The answer is Option B , the solution is 3
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
A six sigma level has a lower and upper specification limits between
and
. It means that the probability of finding no defects in a process is, considering 12 significant figures, for values symmetrically covered for standard deviations from the mean of a normal distribution:

For those with defects <em>operating at a 6 sigma level, </em>the probability is:

Similarly, for finding <em>no defects</em> in a 5 sigma level, we have:
.
The probability of defects is:

Well, the defects present in a six sigma level and a five sigma level are, respectively:
Then, comparing both fractions, we can confirm that a <em>6 sigma level is markedly different when it comes to the number of defects present:</em>
[1]
[2]
Comparing [1] and [2], a six sigma process has <em>2 defects per billion</em> opportunities, whereas a five sigma process has <em>600 defects per billion</em> opportunities.
I'm not sure what the equation would be, but its the number multiplied by two, and It keeps accumulating so maybe yx2?
Answer:
- 60<em><u>÷</u></em><em><u>15</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u>4</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>Therefore</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Martin</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>uses</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>his</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>power</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>saw</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>4</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>times</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>in</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>one</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>hour</u></em><em><u> </u></em>