Answer:
0.025
Step-by-step explanation:
-This is a conditional probability problem.
-Let L denote lens defect and C charging defect.
#We first calculate the probability of a camera having a lens defect;

#Calculate the probability of a camera having a charging defect:

The the probability that a camera has a lens defect given that it has a charging defect is calculated as:

Hence, the probability that a camera has a lens defect given that it has a charging defect is 0.025
9514 1404 393
Answer:
false
Step-by-step explanation:
The conjecture shown in this problem statement does not follow from the examples offered. They support the notion that ...
1/x ≤ x . . . . for x ≥ 0 (<u>not x ≤ 0</u>)
There are several possible counterexamples showing the conjecture is FALSE.
- 1/0 is undefined
- 1/(-5) > -5 . . . . . . . . a case for x < 0
If the intended domain is x ≥ 0, then the conjecture can also be demonstrated to be false for 0 < x < 1:
- 1/(1/5) > 1/5
With what?!??!? Bvbheifnfnfjdjbe
I would say a. is not very common.
I did not calculate the rest, I am just canceling out one for you
I hope this helps.
P.S.-Typing the numbers across like that is very confusing.