Answer:
<u>Reproductive strategies are not an either/or sort of affair; some organisms fall somewhere between semelparity and iteroparity reproduction. In addition to various reproductive strategies, organisms differ in their survivorship strategies. Some organisms are at high risk of dying early in life, but if they can survive long enough, they have a decreasing probability of dying as the years go on. Well, to a point anyway. Other organisms have a steadily increasing probability of dying while still others live for a long time with the probability of dying only increasing dramatically after a certain (often old) age.</u>
I really hope this helps, stay safe!
Answer:
A control group is a set standard so that comparisons can be made to see what your experiment did. The experimental group is the group that has been changed. A control group also allows you to determine your variables.
Explanation:
Answer:
1) Deforestation has real consequences for animals. The most serious impacts of deforestation on animals are listed below. #1 Habitat loss Deforestation can lead to a direct loss of wildlife habitat as well as a general degradation of their habitat.
2)When there is less soil stability because of the disadvantage of erosion, the risk of a flooding event occurring during the rainy season increases dramatically. Poor water absorption levels make it easier for higher accumulation levels since the trees are no longer present to take up the extra moisture.
Explanation:
Answer:
Aggregates
Explanation:
Aggregates are thin flat plates that lie horizontally. Usually present in compacted soils, or clay deposits. This type of structure stimulates slow water infiltration.
(copied from wikihow)
"The first and second hominids were able to mate and produce offspring, but the first and third hominids could not." <span>Although that might be the case, it might also not. "More similar" needn't be 'similar enough' (disregarding the fact that all homonid specimens involved could happen to share the same sex). </span>
<span>"The first and second hominids shared the same geographic location, while the third was isolated." </span>
<span>That information would be revealed by the geographic location they came from. </span>
<span>"The first and second hominids most likely became extinct before the third hominid species." </span>
<span>Perhaps or perhaps not. As ancestral lineages can survive for longer than descendant lineages, it needn't apply. Still, I suppose the non-existent law of averages provides some sort of justification for the use of "Most likely". </span>
<span>"The first and second hominids have a more recent common ancestor than the first and third hominids." </span>
<span>Assuming these are all in the same neat lineage, then the most recent common ancestor of the first and second is also the most recent common ancestor of the first and the third.</span>
