Answer:
3 is the answer
Explanation how i got the answer
Answer:. Kent is most likely to infer that "THE TEST HAS POOR EVIDENCE OF RELIABILITY"
Explanation: For Kent to discover that a particular test is not stable or consistent over time, that means that the test result changes with time. Therefore the test result is not reliable and cannot be categorized.
According to evidential proof of Truth, which states that a statement can only be true, if they is a valid evidence to that statement. Because the result of this test changes with time, they will be no valid evidence to proof a result from such test to be true. This shows that the test has poor evidence to rely on the result to be true.
Answer:
These Juries were capable of coming to two such verdict because, a criminal jury's burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and a civil jury's burden of proof is "preponderance of the evidence."
A criminal's jury burden of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt means that the legal standard for deciding the outcome of a criminal charge, requires evidence that is sufficient to eliminate any doubts that a reasonable person might entertain about whether a claim is more likely to be true than not.
A civil jury burden of proof being preponderance of the evidence means that the legal standard applied for deciding the outcome of civil disputes, requires that evidence be sufficient to determine that a claim is more likely to be true than not.
The black hand was a secret serbian society that used terrorist methods to promote the liberation of Serbs outside Serbia from Habsburg or Ottoman rule and was instrumental in planning the assassination of the Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand, <span>precipitating the outbreak of </span>World War 1.
So based on that I believe the answer is, A.
