Answer:
by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring.
Explanation:
The given excerpt highlights more about Professor Shuman. His involvement in gambling has been more focused rather than on the activity and the ills of the event. In this way, the real issue of the gambling process gets blurred. In order to make the report more objective, the commentary focusing on the professor being involved in the gambling needs to be removed.
Because in ancient times people would make stories to help them more understand the world around them.
I would say A. Science helps us understand nature
:D
