Answer:
When English settlers arrived on the North American continent to start their lives anew, many of them gave little thought to the native peoples who had long inhabited these lands. The Puritan colonists who arrived in the Connecticut River Valley in the early 17th century quickly learned the benefits and necessities of trade and co-existence with the Pequot and other native groups. An initial period of accommodation and cultural mixing, however, turned bitter as the groups clashed over conflicting views of property, nature, division of labor, and the principles of warfare. Massacre at Mystic traces relations between these groups through the lens of a single day. On May 26, 1637 the English retaliated against the murder of one of their ownby viciously attacking a Pequot encampment. As this documentary explores this massacre, it captures the fateful consequences of these divergent worldviews and the tragic legacy left in its wake. Massacre at Mysticis a dramatic retelling of the development of Puritan and Pequot relationships. Historians and Pequot descendents offer thoughtful commentary based on primary research and up-to-date historical interpretation. While there may have been a period of time in which Europeans and Native Americans could have built a cooperative society together, Massacre at Mysticuses this smaller story as a gripping example of why violence and force prevailed rather than co-existence. Rather than a simple tale of defeat, this program follows the present day Pequot as they have reconstructed a community based on new business enterprises and cultural endeavors. This program is an excellent historical lesson in understanding the development of the early colonies, the devastation of Native American peoples, and the patterns set during these formative years of contact.Curriculum Links:
Massacre at Mysticwould be an excellent addition to any middle school or high school class on American History, European History, World History, Environmental Studies, the History of Agriculture and Science and Technology. It fulfills the following standards as outlined by the National Council for History Education: (1) Civilization, cultural diffusion, and innovation, (2) Conflict and cooperation, and (3) Human interaction with the environment
Explanation:
Answer:
Nigeria doesn't wish to be involved in foreign policy that is not in its best interest. The federal government should not associate itself as a matter of routine with power blocks. Does it follow this? No, mainly because of its economic alignment with the west.
Explanation:
Sorry, it's a short answer I wanted to get it to you as soon as I could. If you have any more questions feel free to reach out.
Answer:
Las revoluciones liberales inspirarion los procesos independentistas de las colonias americanas.
Explanation:
La revolución francesa es la precursora de las revoluciones liberales de principios del siglo XIX, recordamos que la revolución francesa se consuma para muchos historiadores en el año 1799, con ella los movimientos libertarios de Europa se hace cada vez más grandes, Alemania, Italia y Francia se sublevan contra las monarquías dando paso a repúblicas y democracias lo cuál debilitó fuertemente al poder de la corona, y el poder que podían ejercer en las colonias americanas, con España batallando para controlar sus colonias, Francia dejando Canada prácticamente libre e Inglaterra batallando para controlar las 13 colonias los ideales de libertad, igualdad y fraternidad permearon en las colonias e iniciaron, aunado a la falta de poder económico de las monarquías dieron paso a los movimientos independentista.
Answer:
the aristocracy slowly shifted towards English because their attachment with France had waned towards speaking English
Answer: slavery
Explanation: Indentured servitude was in the very infancy of the colonies there were people that would essentially become apprentices in order to make their way in society. With the introduction of chattel slavery there was no longer a need for indentured servitude as they indentured servants would eventually be able to work for their freedom. Slaves were seen as an endless supply of expendable labor which was far cheaper than indentured servants. Hope this helps!
