Answer:
The Italian city-states were a political phenomenon of small independent states mostly in the central and northern Italian Peninsula between the 9th and the 15th centuries.
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, urban settlements in Italy generally enjoyed a greater continuity than in the rest of western Europe. Many of these towns were survivors of earlier Etruscan, Umbrian and Roman towns which had existed within the Roman Empire. The republican institutions of Rome had also survived. Some feudal lords existed with a servile labour force and huge tracts of land, but by the 11th century, many cities, including Venice, Milan, Florence, Genoa, Pisa, Lucca, Cremona, Siena, Città di Castello, Perugia, and many others, had become large trading metropoles, able to obtain independence from
Whereas previous Chief Justices of the Supreme Court (John Jay, John Rutledge, and Oliver Ellsworth) left little real mark behind in there tenures, Marshall established several principles essential to the modern Supreme Court.
Most essential, in the <em>Marbury v Madison </em>case, his court established that the Supreme Court had the authority to overrule both laws of Congress, and the states, as well as executive acts if the court rules them to be in direct violation of the Constitution.
Believe it or not, Judicial Review was not originally initially in the constitution as defined above, and Marshall's court established it as a power in the Judical branch.
If the aim is to compare the figures reached in the two periods, the best mechanism is to calculate the growth in percentage(%). In order to do so, the formula showed in the photo has to be applied to each of the 3 variables analyzed, always placing the newest value in the position <em>V Present </em>and the oldest one in <em>V Past. </em>
- Population % growth = ((132,000-120,000)/120,000 )*100= + 10%
- Nº of workers % growth = ((86,250-84,000)/84,000)*100= +2.67%
- GDP % growth =((6,220,800,000-5,760,000,000)5,760,000,000)/*100= + 8 %
The Supreme Court in The United States vs. Nixon case ruled against President Nixon in its ruling because Nixon has held important information stored in tapes required for investigation.
<h3>What was the United States vs. Nixon case?</h3>
The case United States vs. Nixon highlights the storing of important information related to the commitment to crime. The Supreme court obliged that no one can hold information like this and limited the power of the president.
After the statement from the supreme court, president Nixon argued that he has "executive privilege" to do which is denied by the court, and ordered that he has to return it as no one is above the law.
Learn more about the United States vs. Nixon case, here:
brainly.com/question/20375312
#SPJ1