The Dred Scott Supreme Court case ruled that slaves are property and are allowed in all states/territories, even if slavery is outlawed in the state constitution.
This idea supports the concept of nullification, as states that abolished slavery would nullify (refuse) to follow this ruling because they felt it was unconstitutional.
This idea also limited the power of the federal government to restrict the expansion of slavery because the court ruled that slaves do not have legal rights and are considered property no matter where they go. This meant that slavery can essentially exist anywhere in the US and the federal government couldn't change that unless they made a national law/amendment that outlawed slavery.
Regarding the source, we can comment on the following.
- Because you forgot to attach the article, we do not know the content of it. However, we gladly can comment on the following general terms.
- The source of información has to be valid, and you have to cite it in your article.
- The validation of your article depends on the proper primary and secondary sources you cite as part of your arguments.
- That is the reason why the sources for the article influence the content of the article.
- Good sources mean a solid argument and more interest on the part of your readers.
- Bad or questionable sources mean that your article won't have the credibility needed to be accepted.
We conclude that is very important for the writer to include reliable primary and secondary sources in his article to impact the audience.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/336747?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The Patriot victory at Saratoga is often seen as the turning point in the war. Not only did it renew the morale of the American public, but it convinced potential foreign partners, such as France, that American could win the war, and that it might be in their best interests to send aid.
It is not a requirement that one must have "at least a college degree" in order to become a member of the House of Representatives," since this would not go over well with the "base" of many political parties.
<span>This was the padrone. These were Italian immigrants who had been stationed in the US for a time and served as a go-between for the new immigrants and the heads of businesses. He was able to help the new citizens find a job, while at the same time helping to provide a steady stream of labor for the employer, benefiting both sides.</span>
