He didn't beleave in the pope
Answer:
It is your decision on if it is right, but I will give insight on the very basics of how our government deals with power distribution and why. And a touch of opinion. Happy New Year!
Explanation:
Giving the president the power of executive authority would make our government the same as a dictatorial one. That is one of the main reasons our government has 3 branches, it’s a checks and balances system that keeps those in power relying on each other to make decisions. The question of if it is right that a president should or shouldn’t have executive authority has raged on every since America first considered becoming independent from Britain, but based on the numerous times a British monarch given executive authority abused it, we can guess the same thing could easily happen with our president. At the very least a president should not have full freedom in passing policies, but the real difficult question is “To what extent should a president be able to pass policies, and congress oversee the affairs of the president?” This question applies to not just the president and Congress, but also the judicial branch and state governments. It’s a tough question.
That depends what you mean by early, do you mean the civilizations of Egypt or Mesopotamia or Israel.
van III's success in making Moscow the centre of Russian power earned him the title "the Great." He was the first ruler to use the titles of Tsar and ‘Ruler of all Russia.’ Ivan III died on 27 October 1505 and was succeeded by his son Vasiliy III. hopes this helps plz put me as brainliest
