All categories

2 years ago

Help me to answer this Math pls

Mathematics

1 answer:

Crank2 years ago

5 0

Answer:
a) 1) equilateral (all equal sides)
2) isosceles (equal opp. sides)
3) scalene (unequal sides)

b) 1) obtuse (> 90°)
2) acute (< 90°)
3) right (90°)

c) 1) Equilateral & equiangular (< 90° & equal sides)
2) Right scalene (90° & diff sides)
3) Acute isosceles (< 90° & 2 equal opp. sides)

Hope it helps ⚜

You might be interested in

A radio station installs a vhf radio tower that stands 1500 ft

aleksley [76]

Whats the question u just told us some of the information

4 0

3 years ago

Selena and Drake are evaluating the expression , when . Selena's Work Drake's Work Who is correct and why? Selena is incorrect b

Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Selena is correct because she simplified correctly and then evaluated correctly after substituting the values for the variables.

I did this lesson i asked my teacher to help me but i did this problem on my own so i hope its right :)

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

0.3(n-5)=0.4-0.2 solve for n!

mariarad [96]

Answer:

$n = 5.67$

Step-by-step explanation:

0.3(n-5)=0.4-0.2

0.3(n-5) = 0.2

Dividing 0.3 both side

$\frac{0.3(n-5) }{0.3} = \frac{0.2}{0.3}$

$n-5 = 0.67$

$n = 0.67+5$

$n = 5.67$

4 0

3 years ago

Which statement explains why the value of [2.4] is 2 but the value of [-2.4] is –3?

GenaCL600 [577]

For any x in Real numbers, [x] is the greatest possible integer smaller than x, or equal to x if x is an integer.

According to this,

<span>[2.4] is the greatest integer , smaller than or equal to (so non greater) 2.4. This number is 2

similarly, </span>[-2.4] is the greatest integer , smaller than or equal to (so non greater) -2.4. This number is -3.

Answer:

A) <span>Because 2 is the greatest integer not greater than 2.4 and –3 is the greatest integer not greater than –2.4. </span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Joshua invested $750 in an account paying an interest rate of

Maslowich

Due to the difference in the interest rate and the quarterly compounding, Joshua will have $212.24 more than Josiah.
Step-by-step explanation:
Giving the following information:
Joshua:
Initial investment (PV)= $750
Interest rate (i)= 0.0341/4= 0.008525
Number of periods (n)= 18*4= 72 quarters
Josiah:
Initial investment (PV)= $750
Interest rate (i)= 0.0285
Number of periods (n)= 18 years
To calculate the future value of each one, we need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1 + i)^n
Joshua:
FV= 750*(1.008525^72)
FV= $1,381.98
Josiah:
FV= 750*(1.0285^18)
FV= $1,169.74
Due to the difference in the interest rate and the quarterly compounding, Joshua will have $212.24 more than Josiah.

5 0

2 years ago

Help me to answer this Math pls​

Help me to answer this Math pls