Step-by-step explanation:
E3, E6, E11, E7: no solution
E1, E12 : 1 solution
E2, E8, E10 : infinite solutions
I believe it is, 9/5.
Mixed fraction: 1 4/5.
Answer:
The amount of change he should received is
$100 - $56.875
= $43.125
= $43.13
Step-by-step explanation:
Length of window trim = 32 and 1/2 ft
Cost per foot = $1.75
Amount paid = $100
Total cost of window trim = 32.5×1.75 = $56.875
The amount of change he should received is
$100 - $56.875
= $43.125
= $43.13
Answer:
The correct option is c which is if this test was one-tailed instead of two-tailed, you would reject the null.
Step-by-step explanation:
a: This statement cannot be true as the p-value for a 1 tailed test is dependent on the level of significance and other features.
b: This statement cannot be true as there is no valid mathematical correlation between the p-value of the one-tailed test and the current p-value.
c: This statement is true because due to the enhanced level of significance, the null hypothesis will not be rejected.
d: This statement is inverse of statement c which cannot be true.
e: The statement cannot be true as there is no correlation between the current p-value and the p-value of 1 tailed test. The correlation exists between the values of one-tailed and two-tailed p-values.
