Answer:
This is an example of a mitigating factor.
Explanation:
In criminal law, a mitigating factor is an extenuating circumstance or condition that might lead the jury or judge to lessen a sentence or take into consideration because it explains in greater detail why a defendant might have committed a crime. The factor or circumstance usually makes it more understandable why the defendant took certain actions or why it is possible to have some sympathy or empathy for the defendant. An example would be if the defendant had been manipulated by someone else, for example, or if the crime was committed under duress of some sort, like being mandated to do something by your superiors at work.
North America is bordered in the north by the Artic Ocean, in the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and in the west by the Pacific Ocean. Also, the Caribbean Sea is to North America's southeast.
Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
John Rawls tossed this Latin expression around "a blank state" to enable us to comprehend ourselves in a circumstance in which there were no tenets. We needed to build up the standards for how we would communicate with each other exclusively and in business. Rawls trusted that judicious souls would concur on some fundamental and reasonable tenets that would help them additionally secure others.
