All categories

2 years ago

HELP PLZZ ASAP WILL GIVE BRAIIEST

Business

2 answers:

neonofarm [45]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Well for one sanitizing everything like crazy.We wouldn't run out of toiletry so fast and we would not be wearing mask even when we are driving by alone.If scientist never looked more about vaccine then we wouldn't of known about the other types of corona.

I hope this helps!

Ne4ueva [31]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Well for one sanitizing everything like crazy. We wouldn't run out of toilet paper so fast and we would not be wearing masks even when we are driving by alone. If scientists never looked more into vaccines then we wouldn't have known about the other types of the corona.

Explanation:

Good luck!

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements correctly characterizes the elasticity of demand for food? a. While food demand is not very re

Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

b. As income increases, the quantity demanded of food decrease

Explanation:

food weights for individuals whose income is sufficient enought to keep them healty and feed will not increase their food consumption much else. That's because, their already have it covered and want to saisfy new needs

The demand for food is only high at low levels of income.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a similarity between an industrial metrologist and a legal metrologist?

avanturin [10]

Answer:

is a

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

: During June of 1997: Steve Wall, the Advanced Projects Design Team Leader at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, estimated that

slava [35]

Answer:

This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.

Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.

We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.

But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.

If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.

8 0

3 years ago

If you buy the stock and plan to sell it 3 years from now, what are your expected cash flows in (i) year 1; (ii) year 2; (iii) y

Goryan [66]

Answer and Explanation:

Year 1 Dividend = 1.04

Year 2 Dividend = 1.08

Year 3 Dividend = 1.12

Year 3 Sale of Stock = 14.62

Year 1 Total Cash Flow = 1.04

Year 2 Total Cash Flow = 1.08

Year 3 Total Cash Flow = 15.74

3 0

3 years ago

Filer Manufacturing has 8 million shares of common stock outstanding. The current share price is $74, and the book value per sha

GaryK [48]

Answer:

10.45%

Explanation:

First find the cost of equity for the company

RE = [$4.60*(1.05) / $74] + 0.05

RE = 0.1153, or 11.53%

Then find the YTM on both bond issues

P1 = $950 = $45*PVIFA(R%,48) + $1,000*PVIF(R%,48)

R = 4.767%

YTM = 4.767%×2

YTM = 9.53%

P2 = $1,080 = $50*PVIFA(R%,16) + $1,000*PVIF(R%,16)

R = 4.298%

YTM = 4.298%×2

YTM = 8.60%

Total Debt = 0.95($80,000,000) + 1.08*($60,000,000)

Total Debt = $140,800,000

Weight of D1 = 76,000,000 / 140,800,000

Weight of D1 = 0.5398

Weight of D2 = 64,800,000 / 140,800,000

Weight of D2 = 0.4602

Weighted Average after-tax cost of debt

RD = (1 – 0.35)*[(0.5398)*(0.0953) + (0.4602)(0.086)]

RD = .0592, or 5.92%

Market value of equity = 8,000,000*($74) = $592,000,000

Market value of debt = $140,800,000

Total market value of the company = $592,000,000 + 140,800,000 = $732,800,000

Weights of equity and debt

E/V = $592,000,000 / $732,800,000 = 0.8079

D/V = 1−E/V = 0.1921

WACC = 0.8079(0.1153) + 0.1921(0.0592)

WACC = 0.1045, or 10.45%

7 0

3 years ago