Answer:
believing
Explanation:
Saying becomes believing: In psychology, the term "saying becomes believing" is referred to as an effect or phenomenon that an individual tends to believe and remember the things that he or she has said to that of another person. In fact, it is said that an individual tends to tell the other person about various thought-process that he or she feels about the other persons desire to hear irrespective of the reality that the person actually thinks or feels about the other person.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the example of saying becomes believing.
Disagree they aren’t weak they are just following the law to have no problems
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:
antipsychotics
Explanation:
They ease symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations. These drugs work on chemicals in the brain such as dopamine and serotonin
Answer:
reference attached
<h2><em>hope</em> <em>it</em> <em>helps</em> <em>you<</em><em>3</em><em>~</em><em>~</em></h2>
