The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>The state governments may vary in amount of power shared with the central government"
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "</span><span>It does not have a president or other executive authority that enforces laws and policy separate from lawmakers."</span>
The consequences of the East Los Angeles walkouts of 1968 includes:
- A. More Latino teachers were employed by the school district.
- B. Students brought attention to the need for reform in education.
- E. There was a dramatic rise in the enrollment of Latino students at one university.
<h3>What happened in East Los Angeles walkouts of 1968?</h3>
Basically, these walkouts are also called the East L.A. blowouts. It referred to the social protest that took place in March 1968 in which thousands of Mexican American high-school students walked out of classes in Los Angeles for protest against an inequality in the public education system.
In conclusion, the East Los Angeles walkouts by the student also contributed to the wider Chicano movement that was seeking civil rights reform for Latinos.
Read more about Los Angeles walkouts
brainly.com/question/26848681
#SPJ1
Explanation:
<em>In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. ... One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.</em>
Answer:
The answer is the cotton farms were dominating the southern economy.
Explanation:
King Cotton was a popular term used in antebellum south, mostly due to the fact that cotton dominated the southern economy. The slaves worked hard in cotton plantation bringing prosperity and economy growth to the south.
The nativists believed that immigrants would destroy America. So, option (b) can be considered as the suitable option.
<h3>Why do nativists oppose immigration?</h3>
Joel S. Fetzer claims that conflicts over national, cultural, and religious identity frequently lead to hostility to immigration in many nations. Particularly in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, as well as in continental Europe, the phenomenon has been examined. As a result, the term "nativism" has evolved to refer broadly to opposition to immigration motivated by worries that newcomers may "distort or corrupt" preexisting cultural norms. Nativist movements try to stop cultural change when immigrants outnumber native-born people by a wide margin.
Many of the following arguments against immigrants are used to support immigration restrictionist sentiment :
Economic :
- Employment : Immigrants take occupations that would have been open to native citizens otherwise, which reduces native employment. They also produce a labor surplus, which drives down wages.
- Immigrants incur a cost to the government since they do not pay enough taxes to pay for the services they need.
- Social welfare systems are heavily utilized by immigrants.
- Housing : As vacancies are reduced by immigrants, rents rise.
Cultural
- Language : Immigrants refuse to pick up the native tongue and withdraw into their own communities.
- Culture : As immigrants outnumber the local populace, their culture will take its place.
- Crime : Compared to the native population, immigrants are more likely to commit crimes.
- Patriotism : Immigrants erode a country's feeling of ethnic and national identity.
To know more about, immigration, visit :
brainly.com/question/17124402
#SPJ9
