It is true that the deviant consumers include those who consume too much and those who do not consume enough.
Basically, deviance refers to behaviors that violate the social rules and norms.
- The deviant consumers are consumers who exhibits the behaviors that violate the social rules and norms.
- Example of deviant consumers behavior includes shoplifting, price altering, destroying merchandise, damaging merchandise etc
Therefore, It is true that the deviant consumers include those who consume too much and those who do not consume enough.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/11132206</em>
The Bill has to be introduced, then it will have to go the house of representatives, they will vote, if passed then they congress have to pass it too, if this done so. The president have to sign it.
Answer:
it was
Georgia had suffered from many crop failures because of boll weevils and a great drought. The "King Cotton" that went up during WW1 had dropped back down, and farmers were struggling to keep their land. Then the depression struck, and Georgia was hit harder than ever.
Answer:
Autonomic nervous system
Explanation:
The autonomic nervous system is the part of the nervous system that is responsible for involuntary actions in our bodies. Involuntary actions or functions are those functions in our bodies that are performed without our being conscious about it. For example, heartbeat, flowing of blood, digestion, etc.
<u>In the given case, when Stacey experienced fight-or-flight her sympathetic branch was activated due to the autonomic nervous system as her heartbeat started pumping faster and her blood pressure surged</u>.
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. This is where federal cases are tried, where witnesses testify, and federal juries serve. There are 94 federal district courts in the United States. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
I think it's necessary. We live in a society in the process of building a democracy accessible to all people. Like every process, we are subject to failure. The justice system has been questioned by social movements about their decisions, often considered unfair. In this way, the possibility of appealing to a new analysis of the case is important so that some decisions are reviewed.
