1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MaRussiya [10]
3 years ago
13

What is the second step in the prewriting process for an argumentative essay?

Social Studies
2 answers:
kompoz [17]3 years ago
7 0
The second step in the prewriting process is to make sure that where you are getting any information, is from a credible and reliable source.
givi [52]3 years ago
4 0

Correct answer is:

<h2>A forming a claim.</h2><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3>Argumentative essay is divided into three major sections.</h3><h2>1. Introduction                                                </h2>

In the introduction, we give the brief outline with all importation points to be discussed later.

<h2>2. Body                                           </h2>

Body is further divided into three parts

  • Facts
  • Supporting evidence
  • Critical analysis
<h2>3.    Conclusion                                                    </h2>

Last paragraph which includes resultant approach about the topics either opposing or supporting

The purpose of the body paragraph is to provide references, supporting arguments with compiling decisions.

You might be interested in
James Locke argues that all humans are born with what natural rights?
MatroZZZ [7]

James Locke wrote the Second Treatise of Government in 1689 during England's Glorious Revolution. Many people believe that Thomas Jefferson's ideas for the Declaration of Independence came from his knowledge of Locke's work.

Locke wrote that all people are equal and they are born with "unalienable" rights. "Unalienable" means rights that cannot be taken away or denied for any reason.

Locke believed that these rights were fundamental: life, liberty, and property.

Let's discuss his definition of these unalienable rights individually:

Life - This is the most basic right. A person should preserve life and mankind itself. He found it to be a duty and a right. This applied to everyone - except murderers. Since they broke this fundamental right, they forfeited their rights to their own life.

Liberty - Locke believed that people had the right to be free. This meant being able to make your own choices and live your life the way that you wanted to - as long what you are doing is not interfering or infringing on others' rights.

Property - This doesn't just mean land or possessions, like a student might think. Locke also meant this to include the actual person, themselves and their well-being.

5 0
3 years ago
Describe Gandhi’s march to Dandi.
yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

His march to Dandi was more like a peaceful protest. In his opinion violence was never the answer. Also many fellow Indians followed Gandhi from his "religious retreat" for a distance of almost 240 miles (imagine walking that much, sheesh-). In the end the march resulted with 60,000 people arrested as well as Gandhi himself.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
in scientific inquiry, a stated possible explanation is called/A. a law/B. an observation/C. a theory/D. a hypothesis
goldenfox [79]
The answer is hypothesis.... its 100% correct.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the gender roles of early human societies
Marysya12 [62]

Depending on how early you are speaking of, but generally females were required to stay home and raise their children while males often went to work or war. If war, females usually found jobs as well to support their families whilst their spouse was away.

4 0
3 years ago
1. What precedent (norm) was set in 1954 in our country? What impact did this court case and decision have on
lesya [120]

Answer:

Explanation:

By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Como se menciona en el Boletín #7 es hora de comenzar hacer el prototipo de tu invento, puedes hacer como maqueta, plano o dibuj
    10·1 answer
  • Tanya, a social activist, works closely with a local NGO to spread awareness about the importance of education in rural areas. S
    8·1 answer
  • Charmaine was a teenager who recently moved into a new neighborhood. The majority of the teenagers in this new neighborhood eith
    5·1 answer
  • What was Abraham Lincoln talking about when he said A house divided against itself cannot stand​
    7·1 answer
  • Please answer this fast i will make brainliest!!
    10·1 answer
  • No links pls. 20 points!!!The Pennsylvania Gazette was owned by Ben Franklin. What risks would other newspapers take it ey nepri
    6·1 answer
  • In which type of symbiosis do BOTH species benefit from each other?
    12·2 answers
  • What does the prefix hyper- mean in the word hyperactive?
    14·2 answers
  • 12. Which of the following statements best
    6·1 answer
  • If alternate view 1 is displayed to all students, which part of the cia triad is at risk? why?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!