Answer:
proportional
Step-by-step explanation:
hope that helps! :)
I think I may be missing something ... I don't completely understand your question.
All you need to make a fraction is two numbers and a bar. The bar can be either
horizontal or slanty. Then you write one number on top and the other number on
the bottom, and bada-bing, you have a fraction.
You can make fractions like
2700 / 600
27 / 6
9 / 2 (all 3 of these have the same value)
600 / 2700
6 / 27
2 / 9 (all 3 of these have the same value)
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
Answer:
22 of the 95$ ones and 10 of the 125
Step-by-step explanation:
22 times 95 = 2090
10 times 125 = 1250
2090+1250=3340
hope this helped
F and D is the answer
hope this helps
have a good day
