Answer: Out group Favoritism
Explanation: Generally, it is normal for people to tend to categorize themselves and other people into sets. when individuals categorize other people as being part of their group , such individuals consider themselves as grouping of others , and other people not in their circle as out group. this tends to make such individual see the other group much more than their group and to sometimes negatively classify the out group which he or she does not belong to as opposed to the in group they belong to.
Out group favoritism explains that under certain conditions, people will prefer and have affinity for one's out-group over the in-group, which can be seen in one's expression in the evaluation of the outgroup and in terms of allocation of resources.
Here, eight-year-old Jennifer, an African American, who describes the white, wealthier girls in her school as "pretty," "smart," and "nice," whereas she describes the black, poorer girls as "bossy," "average," and "chubby." is expressing Out group favoritism
Quiero decir A pero yo podría ser <span>equivocado</span>.
The tendency for people to see their environment only as it affects them and as it is consistent with their expectations is known as selective perception.
<h3>What is selective perception?</h3>
This is the ability of people to categorize and analyze the stimuli that they are experiencing in the environment that they exist in.
It has to do with how the stimuli affects them and the fact that it is consistent with what they expect.
Read more on selective perception here: brainly.com/question/14314991
#SPJ1
Answer:
Parens Patriae
Explanation:
A doctrine that grants the inherent power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own behalf.
The parens patriae doctrine has its roots in English Common Law.
In the United States, the parens patriae doctrine has had its greatest application in the treatment of children, mentally ill persons, and other individuals who are legally incompetent to manage their affairs. The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state.
The state, acting as parens patriae, can make decisions regarding mental health treatment on behalf of one who is mentally incompetent to make the decision on his or her own behalf, but the extent of the state's intrusion is limited to reasonable and necessary treatment.
