The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine
Explanation:
The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine was just a temporary solution to the problem. Southerners believed federal regulation of slavery was unconstitutional and to imposing a restriction on the institution of slavery was out of their jurisdiction.
Answer: The trade of Missouri as a slave nation in choose of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a loose Maine
Explanation: The change of Missouri as a slave nation in choose of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a loose Maine became only a transient way to the problem. Southerners believed federal law of slavery became unconstitutional and to impose a restrict at the instituion of slavery became out in their jurisdiction.
Another Question to the Topic: Why was the Missouri Compromise not a permanent solution to slavery?
Answer: The Missouri Compromise changed into useless in handling the problem of slavery as it elevated sectionalism among Northern and Southern states. Instead of fixing this difficulty of slavery in new territories Congress best elevated the anxiety among North and South.
Parliament, desiring revenue from its North American colonies, passed the first law specifically aimed at raising colonial money for the Crown. The act increased duties on non-British goods shipped to the colonies.
