Step-by-step explanation:
Area of a trapezium = SOPS/2 × ph
Sops is the sum of 4+10 = <u>1</u><u>4</u>
14/2 is 7. 7×4 = <u>2</u><u>8</u>
<u>A</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>8</u><u>c</u><u>m</u><u>²</u>
Area = L×W
10×6= 60cm²
This is simple :)
If 9 chairs can fit in one box, and you have 3,456 chairs, just divide how many chairs you have by how many can fit in the box in order to find how many boxes you will need.
3,456/9 = 384
384 boxes will be needed
Answer:
Number of small boxes shipped = 7
Number of large boxes shipped = 15
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of small boxes = s
And the number of large boxes = l
Weight of small box = 25 pound
Weight of the large box = 50 pounds
Total weight of the shipment = 925 pounds
Therefore, equation for the weight of shipment will be,
25s + 50l = 925
s + 2l = 37 ----- (1)
Total number of boxes shipped = 22 boxes
Therefore, equation will be,
s + l = 22 ------(2)
Subtract equation (2) from equation (1)
(s + 2l) - (s + l) = 37 -22
l = 15
From equation (2)
s + 15 = 22
s = 7
Therefore, number of small boxes shipped = 7
Number of large boxes shipped = 15
Answer:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean for this case is 46.7, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation the statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Answer: 4.8
Step-by-step explanation:0.6*5+0.6*1 1/2*2