Locke believed in a state of nature (no government) people would be unsafe and no one would be peaceful to each other. Hobbes was the opposite of that and believed everyone would help one another and be kind.
As a example, let’s say there was a protest and police had a hard time keeping it in control. People start breaching in stores and stealing and some even start shooting. This is a great example of state of nature (no one in control) and Locke’s theory.
Divide
Answer needs to be 20 characters, so I am adding filler.
To exactly which Anti-Vietnam Movement do you refer. You want a short answer. Simply listing the various groups would be too long, and each had its own ideologies. Guess it's time to hit the books.
<span>Feisty is right. I checked too. Since you only want short answers and no detail, it is abundantly clear that you don't want any reliable or relevant information. Good attitude. Lots of luck in life, but please to the rest of us a favor: when you're old enough, please, please, please DON'T vote.</span>
There were several reasons why the English should colonize the new world. One of the most important reasons was the fact that the new world had resources that the English did not have access to. Establishing colonies in North America would allow England to gain resources such as peppers, potatoes, tomatoes, tobacco, and turkey (to name a few).
Another reason why England should colonize was because it would expand their empire. During this time period of colonization, the strongest nations were the ones with the most land. England, not wanting to fall behind, made sure they colonized new lands often so they may be seen as a global superpower.
For the citizens who left England for the new world, they saw this is a golden opportunity to start over. Many poor English citizens took the trip to the new world in hopes of making a better life for themselves and their families.