The correct answer is disease.
Many of the Europeans were carrying disease that they had acquired immunity to since the diseases had been rampaging around Europe for centuries.
But the people of the Americas did not have the immunity and it almost wiped them out.
Answer and explanation:
The Columbian exchange or Columbian interchange is a term named after Christopher Columbus. It refers to the colonization and subsequent trade that began with Columbus's trip in 1492. The Columbian exchange involved the Americas, Europe, and West Africa during the 15th and 16th centuries, and resulted in an extensive transfer that greatly impacted all involved. The term contemplates not only the trade of goods, but also of animals, people, cultures, and even diseases. Some of the major things exchanged were domesticated animals - horse, donkey, chicken, cattle, turkey, parrots, guinea pig, etc. -, and fruits and plants - acai, avocado, broccoli, celery, carrot, chia, pecan, oregano, etc. It's worth remembering that products were exported to and from both the New and the Old Word. A side effect of such contact between different continents and people was the transfer of diseases. Indigenous people in the Americas were decimated by the illnesses transmitted by colonizers. The exchange of cultures had a great impact on both Europe and North America. Enslaved Africans brought their knowledge concerning agrarian practices such as water control and milling. Europe began shifting towards Capitalism and was the subject of population growth due to the availability of new products and crops. Colonizers introduced European values to indigenous nations, ranging from land possession and division to monogamy. There was a noticeable disrupt in ecosystems, since the trade of animals brought in invasive species - a species that is not native and, for that reason, tends to spread and damage the environment.
They taxed them and did not agree with freedom. It was a bad idea because it led to a revolution.
Generally, the best way to proceed when you have concerns about the behavior of a colleague is to deal directly with the colleague, unless doing so would compromise a client's confidentiality.
If they continue doing such behavior, we can make it known to those in charge of company ethics. We can provide the evidence of the violations.
If we are unsure whether their behavior is unethical or not, it is better that we may consult with people who are charged with maintenance of ethical standard the concerns you have.
Also direct complain would not help because we may might have misinterpreted the actions of the colleague. So it is better to watch out and deal directly.
To learn more about behavior here
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
