At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
I believe it would be <span>A. Air molecules touch the warm ground, Heating them up because conduction is when a source of energy touches something directly.</span>
Answer:
espero que esto ayude,
No soy tan buena en español pero quiero explicar más o menos
Explanation:
Los votantes eligen un tercio de los senadores y cada miembro de la Cámara de Representantes. Las elecciones intermedias ocurren a mitad de camino entre las elecciones presidenciales. ... Las elecciones al Congreso utilizan el voto popular para elegir ganadores. No usan el Colegio Electoral, que se usa en las elecciones presidenciales.
(Además del poder descrito anteriormente, el Congreso comparte poderes con el presidente en asuntos tales como, enmarcar la política exterior de Y el control sobre el ejército. Por ejemplo, mientras el presidente negocia tratados, solo se ponen en vigencia una vez que el Senado los aprueba.)
True. I believe the Articles of Confederation were like a failed version of the Constitution but I’m not sure.
Explanation:
You begin by acknowledging the protestors perspective. Tell them that you are sorry for what has happened and that you'll work on a solution. You acknowledge that there is a fault in the system and you're first course of action is to fix the system. (By saying you'll fix the system you're not making any solid claims. That way no one can hold anything against you) You acknowledge the concerns of the people, and remind them that violence doesn't solve anything. Remind them that at the end of the there are good officers out there that share the same thoughts as them. That at the end of the day officers are just people also, the fault is in the system and not every officer. It is not fair to blame and attack every officer because of a incident caused by another officer. (This will get the officers to feel like you care for them) Acknowledge that there is freedom of the press, the media can have any perspective and say anything. However, remind people that the media is capable of being one sided and it's best to do some research before forming an opinion. (This will not offend anyone and won't turn the media or people against you) Do not accept the help from you're governor, that will just complicate issues even more because the people will see it as you disliking the protests and riots.
