The graph adequately represents the following case
"The number of employees at a store increased at a constant rate for 5 years. There was a decrease in the number of employees for 2 years. Then the number of employees increased at a greater constant rate for the next few years."
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the above-mentioned problems we need to filter the results through analysing the options given-
We have to keep in mind that-
- For an increase in value/quantity- the graph would be on an upswing
- For decrease in value/quantity- The graph would be in declining mode
- For constant value- horizontal graph line parallel to the x-axis
Now going through the options-
option 1:-
David drove at a constant speed initially- throughout the graph no horizontal line is present, hence this condition does not represent the graph.
option 2:-
test scores increased and then decline- In this condition only two phases are mentioned, whereas in the graph three different phases are present. Hence this condition too does not represent the graph.
option 3:-
After the period of slow.- The graph starts with an upswing. hence this condition too does not represent the graph.
option 4:-
Employees increased and then declined and then again increased. All the above condition corroborates to the above-mentioned graph. hence this condition is represented in the graph
Let
x-------------> first odd integer
x+2---------> second odd integer
x+4---------> third odd integer
we know that
(x)+(x+2)+(x+4)=201--------> 3x+6=201--------> 3x=195-------> x=65
the three <span>sides of triangle RIO are
</span>x=65 in
x+2-----> 65+2-----> 67 in
x+4----> 65+4------> 69 in
then
69²=4761----------> c²
(65²+67²)=8714--------> a²+b²
c² < (a²+b²)---------> the triangle RIO is not obtuse
Is acute angle triangle
<span>statements
1) </span><span>The triangle is obtuse--------> is false
</span>Is acute angle triangle
<span>
2) </span><span>The triangle is scalene-----> is correct
The three sides measures are diferent
3)</span><span>The smallest side measures 61 inches--------> is false
</span><span>The smallest side measures 65 in
</span><span>
4)</span><span>The largest side measures 69 inches-------> is correct
</span><span>
5) </span><span>If triangle RIO is dilated of 1/3, then the perimeter of the dilated triangle will be 3 units smaller
</span><span>If triangle RIO is dilated of 1/3, then news sides are
</span>65/3------> 21.67 in
67/3-------> 22.33 in
69/3------> 23 in
the new perimeter is=21.67+22.33+23------> 67 in
201-67=134 in
therefore
If triangle RIO is dilated of 1/3, then the perimeter of the dilated triangle will be 3 units smaller----------> is false
Because the perimeter of the dilated triangle will be 134 units smaller
Answer:
What do,you mean
Step-by-step explanation:
